Dashrath rupsingh rathod
WebFeb 27, 2024 · Thereafter, in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra and another [ (2014) 9 SCC 129], a 3-Judges Bench of this Court observed that the return of the cheque by the drawee bank would alone constitute commission of the offence under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 and would indicate the place where the offence is committed. WebJul 15, 2016 · Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 9 SCC 129 the matter was transferred to Mumbai. However, it is noticed that the very judgment... Kapila Bhatnagar v. Ajay Girotra 13 Court: Delhi High Court Date: Oct 6, 2015 Cited By: 0 Coram: 1
Dashrath rupsingh rathod
Did you know?
WebDashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State Of Maharashtra on 1 August, 2014. à\211 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE …
WebDec 25, 2024 · In Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 9 SCC 129, following was held with respect to the place of suing: “…Once the cause of action accrues to the complainant, the jurisdiction of the Court to try the case will be determined by reference to the place where the cheque is dishonoured. WebOct 14, 2014 · A three judge bench of the Supreme Court, in the case of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.1, holds that criminal complaints in respect of …
WebDec 8, 2024 · Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs the State of Maharashtra (2014) The Supreme Court’s three- judges bench ruled that the complaint regarding the dishonour of a cheque can be filed only in the Courts within whose local jurisdiction the offence has been committed. 5. Krishna Janardhan Bhat vs. Dattatraya G. Hegde (2008) Web2 hours ago · (xviii) In support of his submission, he relied on the judgments in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra reported in MANU/SC/0655/2014 : (2014) 9 SCC 129, Major General A.S. Gauraya v. S.N. Thakur reported in MANU/SC/0185/1986 : (1986) 2 SCC 709, Nandkishor Prallhad Vyvhare v. Mangala W/o.
WebFirst Hearing Date: 24th September 2012; Decision Date: 18th December 2014; Case Status: Case Disposed; Court Number and Judge: 440-V Addl I Civil Judge And Jmfc;
WebAug 1, 2014 · Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State Of Maharashtra And Another 1 Court: Supreme Court Of India Date: Aug 1, 2014 citrix files to share documents securelyWebOct 24, 2014 · A three Judges bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs State of Maharashtra1 has finally decided the issue of territorial jurisdiction concerning criminal complaints filed under section 138 of … dickinson narrows philadelphia safetyWebFeb 21, 2024 · Therefore, the use of the phrase: 'shall be inquired into and tried only by a Court within whose local jurisdiction 'in Section 142 (2) of the Act 1881 is contextual to the ratio laid down in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod (supra) to the contrary, whereby territorial jurisdiction to try an offence under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 vested in the … citrix fehler 2320WebFeb 20, 2015 · VA Directive 6518 4 f. The VA shall identify and designate as “common” all information that is used across multiple Administrations and staff offices to serve VA … citrix folder locationWebAug 6, 2014 · The Three Judge Bench Judgment in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs.State of Maharashtra & Anr. which held that a Complaint of Dis-honour of Cheque can be filed only to the Court within whose local ... dickinson narrows philadelphia rentalsWebJan 3, 2024 · Although Dashrath Rupsingh is partly correct in saying that an offence is committed the moment cheque is dishonoured at the drawee bank, but it is to be noted … dickinson ncWebApr 23, 2024 · The SC, in the matter of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra: (2014) 9 SCC 129, held that s.177 of the Cr.P.C. was required to be complied with and only the court exercising territorial jurisdiction where the offence was committed – i.e., where the cheque was dishonoured-could entertain a complaint under s.138 of the … citrix flickering windows 10